1 Pares Land Walk
Rochdale OL16 5SX
7 September 2005
|
Persecuting the poor
letting the rich do as they please |
|
|
|
| John Holt |
Chief Crown Prosecutor
P O Box 237
5th Floor, Sunlight House
Quay Street
Manchester M60 3PS
Dear Mr Holt
I refer to your correspondence with Solicitors Lewis Silkin, acting for Keith Exford, Broomleigh Housing Association and Downland Affinity Housing Group. The most recent letter I can find, in a bundle I cannot accommodate in one lever arch file, is 10 November 2004, and your reference JH/SL.
First, if you believe I have or am committing an offence I need to know in sufficient detail that I can know it is an offence, and for me either to stop or ensure I do not do it again. We doubtless all breach the criminal code from time-to-time, but I am trying hard not to give anyone excuses for being unkind to me.
The documents I received last weekend include perjury. In his 8 June 2004 Affidavit, supporting Claim HQ05 X02 574 in the Queen's Bench Division Royal Courts of Justice, filed with the Court on 1 September 2005, Mr Keith Exford states, verbatim,
|
"13. When you do the type of job I do, you have to expect to deal with some very difficult people. For the most part, although Tom Moore was not only difficult but he was offensive and very unpleasant towards me, I saw his behaviour as unacceptable. I decided the best approach was to have nothing to do with him as far as possible. However, there was one particular incident which occurred prior to his eviction some time in 1996 which caused me and my family the very greatest of distress. He wrote a letter and in the course of that letter he used the following expression:
I have one son, born in 1985 who was at that time aged around 12 and he had in fact only just fully recovered from leukaemia. I was really upset by this and when I got that letter I rang my wife and asked her to go and pick up my son from school straightaway. I believed Mr Moore was capable of physical violence, especially after the incident in our office. I felt distressed and threatened both personally and in respect of my family.
|
I have never sent any such letter, and that was never my view. Neither was it the view of Mr Keith Exford, who's solicitor, Mr Christopher Cook states, in his Affidavit dated 26 December 1996,
|
"5. As well as the litigation, there have been mediation meetings between my clients and Mr Moore. These have been aimed at trying to iron out the differences between them in some reasonable way. They went reasonably well at first but came to a sudden and unpleasant end on the 26th November, at a meeting at the Bromley Mediation Service. I was not present but two senior representatives of my clients were. I have seen their file note. In the hearing of the mediator and around five other people, Mr Moore threatened that he would kill Mr and Mrs Valder (his neighbours) and someone he called 'son of Exford' (Keith Exford is the Director of the Plaintiff association). We are not sure who he meant by that - Mr Moore went through a stage of persecuting Mr Exford with correspondence, complaints and press-releases between around 1992 and 1994, and is known not to like him. My clients' representatives formed the view that there was a real and serious possibility of physical harm being done to Mr or Mrs Valder, and have since arranged to have them moved prior to this case being launched." |
Clearly the allegations of Mr Keith Exford above cannot be after Mr Cook compiled his affidavit, as Mr Exford refers to his son being at school, yet the meaning of the term 'son of Exford' has changed, after its apparent use.
In his correspondence and litigation, Keith Exford and his representatives pretend to be the innocent and even surprised victims of some out of control psychopath. The truth is that, starting no later than 1994, Keith Exford and his representatives had blocked my access to services, starting with legal services.
Broomleigh Housing Association Claims invariable succeed because they will not let me appoint solicitors. The allegation against Miss Emma Box in the letter that fronts web site http://www.tom-moore.com was also made some six months earlier against Miss Debra Dupin of Kensington solicitors Oliver Fisher.
In my experience, Miss Emma Box is an exceptionally able solicitor, and her firm, one of Central London's more affluent. On 23 May 2003, in Bromley LBC v Smith and Broomleigh Housing Association, Defendants Mr & Mrs Smith, after having appointed at least nine firms of solicitors, had to represent themselves in the High Court.
I find I am unable to access to services, and parts of my private life are clearly being monitored. In 2000, treatment for my Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea was withdrawn without sufficient excuse, and I have been unable to get it restored, either by the Health Service or at my own expense. I was even removed from a London Night Shelter, by the Metropolitan Police, for no reason other than the person in charge had directed it.
I do not know the root grievance causing Mr Keith Exford and those he instructs to harass me although it clearly has a common origin from the modus operandi. As you can see from inspecting Internet pages at http://defamation.broomleigh.org those representing Mr Exford refuse to discuss the matter.
The actions for and by Mr Keith Exford are clearly criminal, and I ask the CPS to prosecute Mr Exford as a way of bringing it to an end. Were Mr Keith Exford to communicate with me, then agreement is possible. One possible cause is apparent to me, and I believe I have the evidence to show it was not my fault, even over some 15 years, but if I explain anything, the information is used to further harass me.
Mr Keith Exford claims he believes I am "a menace to society," although even in the unemployed state he has inflicted on me, I cannot be by comparison with others. I am keen to work, as I did, between 2001 and 2003, when Mr Exford at times did not know, and at others arranged the employment.
I spent at least three days working alone with someone I later discovered was an employee of Rochdale Social Services. Allowed treatment for my multiple sleep disorders, even at my own expense were I allowed to work, and a little help with my Autism, which is probably something with which I was born, I am sure I could be a net contributor to society.
My concern about his son, Master Exford, was that this young man had Leukemia. As a regular blood donor, and registrant on the prospective bone marrow donor register, I was annoyed that Exford Senior's harassment, by encouraging neighbours to further deprive me of sleep, which had at that stage prevented me donating blood, could even deprive me of an opportunity to save his son's life.
Whatever Mr Keith Exford has done, I wanted his son to live, and the chance to be the one who provided the marrow was something I resented having to miss. I asked what happened to Exford Junior in 2003, and read in their bundle yesterday, that he survived, and my mood lifted on reading that.
Possibly it is because my mother died of Acute Myeloid Leukemia, but I hope I want to do that for anyone. In his latest litigation, Keith Exford accuses me of mocking him by asking about his son. Like many of his letters to you, he is just plain rude.
Please may I hear from you?
Yours sincerely
T Moore
1 Pares Land Walk
Rochdale OL16 5SX
8 November 2005
P O Box 237
5th Floor
Sunlight House
Quay Street
Manchester M60 3PS
Sirs
Please will you reply to my letter if 14 September 2005, about the criminal activities of Mr Keith Philip Exford. Were you unaware that perjury is still a crime in England?
You received my 14 September 2005 at 2344 on 14 September 2005. I attach a further copy of my 14 September 2005 letter, which complains about serious crime.
Your faithfully
T Moore
1 Pares Land Walk
Rochdale OL16 5SX
2 December 2005
P O Box 237
5th Floor
Sunlight House
Quay Street
Manchester M60 3PS
Sirs
May I please have a reply to my letters of 8 November and 7 September 2005 (copies attached)?
Are you complying with standard orders from Mr Keith Exford that neither you nor any of his servants must ever so much as even acknowledge one of my letters?
Your faithfully
T Moore
|
Home Page |
Sept 2005 onwards | Rochdale Housing Menu |
|
Home Page |
Sept 2005 onwards | Rochdale Housing Menu |