Keith Exford removes whistle-blower from William Sutton Homes

  Exford management style
Page
  Inside Housing
Keith Exford v Willian Sutton
13 July 2007
 


 
Keith Exford v Borehamwood Times   Keith Exford v Borehamwood Times   6:05pm Thursday 19th July 2007


By Emma Hutchings


William Sutton Homes, landlord to thousands of tenants in Hertsmere, has been rocked by a management row which sparked a trio of departures.

Two board members, former chairman Kerry Pollard and housing expert Marianne Hood, have been sacked, and chief executive Paul Eastwood resigned last week.

Both board members, who were paid part-time staff, claim they were ousted because they criticised the way parent company Affinity Sutton operated.

Furious Mr Pollard, the former Labour MP for St Albans, said, "I challenged something that was being done and as a result I was removed." Kerry Pollard also has concerns about the future welfare of tenants.
Kerry Pollard
Kerry Pollard

Mr Pollard was dismissed in April 2007, but has not spoken out until now, following last week's dismissal of Ms Hood and the resignation of Mr Eastwood.

This Keith Exford saga began in April 2007, shortly after Ridgehill Housing Association merged with William Sutton and changed its name. It is still based in Elstree Way, Borehamwood.

On April 19 2007, Mr Pollard, who joined Ridgehill's board in October 2005, questioned the way Keith Exford, chief executive of Affinity Sutton Group, carried out an appraisal of Mr Eastwood without consulting Mr Pollard, as per agreed procedure.

On April 25 2007, Mr Pollard was told by Affinity Sutton he was being removed from the William Sutton board, before fellow board members had discussed it. Mr Pollard said, "I had no appraisal, no evidence at all of anything wrong with my performance."
Kerry Pollard
Kerry Pollard

He then asked the Housing Corporation, which monitors housing associations, to look into the matter. No conclusions have yet been drawn from its report. He continued, "I'm anxious to make sure no other housing association gets itself into a trap. It's about total central control."

"I think there will be a degradation of service and that will happen fairly quickly."

Shocked at the treatment of Mr Pollard, Ms Hood, an expert on tenant involvement, also referred the matter to the Housing Corporation. Last week, she was dismissed from the board following a vote in which all but one fellow board member asked for her to be removed.

Members had penalised her for acting as a whistleblower, she said.

Shortly after Mr Pollard's dismissal, Affinity Sutton sent a letter to the Housing Corporation stating that the William Sutton board supported Mr Pollard's dismissal. However, Ms Hood said this was sent before the board had met to discuss the situation and she knew that, at that point, four out of seven members did not support the dismissal.

She said, "I don't know what evidence was given to the investigation. I would now be very worried about what on earth is going on here. Is William Sutton about to disappear?"

A spokeswoman for Affinity Sutton said Mr Eastwood's departure was amicable. She could not comment on Ms Hood's situation because she is taking her case to an employment tribunal.

Regarding Mr Pollard, she said there was an independent investigation which was unequivocal in clearing the organisation.

Mr Eastwood, who was replaced by Keith Exford's long term deputy Neil McCall, declined to comment. McCall is now "Chief Executive" of both William Sutton Homes and Broomleigh Housing Association.

 
  Exford management style
Page
  Inside Housing
Keith Exford v Willian Sutton
13 July 2007